YouTube a Platform for Politics, ORLY?
Yesterday (Monday), The Democratic candidates took questions from YouTube users in a live collaboration between Google's YouTube and CNN. There is rumour that for a fraction of a second, a goatcx picture appeared within one of the videos (this has since been proven as fake). The main thing to note is that there is an illusion that this is the new form democracy will take, using Internet video and social sites like YouTube as a means to discuss and shape politics. But let's take a real look at what really happened behind the scenes between YouTube, CNN and the Democratic candidates.There is an illusion that the questions were uncensored, but in reality I can tell you from experience within this field that the questions were most certainly screened, filtered and hand selected in advance. YouTube users were able to submit their questions in advance, and were allegedly allowed to vote on which were most applicable and relevant. However, the truth lies in a murky middle - the most popular questions were compiled and most likely distributed to each candidates Public Relations team, who in turn chose which questions they think they could spin best and selected the questions they would like to answer. These revised questions were given back and YouTube in partnership with CNN (remember) selected only those questions that the candidates felt comfortable with - regardless of whether they didn't make the user vote for most popular/relevant questions.
So you're left with a selection of questions submitted by YouTube users (which I guess is the closest we can get to anything democratic), which are in turn screened, filtered and reviewed by a CNN and YouTube panel, which again is then sent off to the candidates who screen the questions and choose the ones most capable of supporting their candidate, and those questions are in turn brought to the top of the user 'popular questions list' - which get read live on TV.
So it brings me back to the main point, is youtube really a platform for political debate and discussion? Well I'd say Yes and No, take a look at any video - there is almost always an on-going comment debate/flame war about America, Iraq War, Terrorism, Fear Mongering, Democratic/Republican bashing, or some sort of other political nonsense. So is YouTube a platform capable of political discussion - Yes - because many people seem to use it in this manner, and No - because it is virtually impossible for a free flow discussion due to the very nature of the commenting system, and the ignorance and idiocy of the users (something that all democracies are susceptible and plagued with).
Labels: barack, casting, clinton, cnn, cnn iptv, cnn television, democrats, Green, hilary, live debate, live streaming, obama, online television, open politics, politics, politics 2.0, republican, youtube iptv, youtube tv
Sun Microsystems Inc. signed a deal with AT&T to use it's proprietary Sun Fire Servers and storage servers to run its soon-to-be-released IPTV service named U-Verse. The current Sun technology supports 160, 000 simultaneous connections over the network. Remember this isn't Peer 2 Peer (P2P), it's an asynchronous one-way connection. AT&T already got the full rights over the IPhone and they've made a killing on it. With U-Verse picking up steam, we could see net neutrality laws start buckling as AT&T attempts to ration more of its bandwidth and backbone network for its own services. Scary stuff indeed.
Australian scientists have created a special box-set for your television that makes it possible to control your television set or DVD player without so much as a remote control. Instead lazy viewers can use hand or head gestures to change channels, skip DVDs ahead, or even mute channels.
Microsoft's live broadcasting of the "Live Earth" concerts held across the world have not only done well, but have also broken world history records for the most event or celebration watched online. In the more then a decade that the Internet has been publicly used, we have seen various events broadcasted live on the Internet including Woodstock, New Year Celebrations (Millennium celebration), premier of movies, live casting of historical events like the War in Iraq, news broadcastings live from the scene (9/11, 7/7 newscasts) and even television premiers.
In anticipation of the Simpsons Movie, 14 Springfields across America were nominated to take part in an Official content which would dub one of the lucky towns to be dubbed the real "Springfield" - a crowning glory that would render the town the official headquarters of everything Simpsons. Not only that but it would bring much tourism and attraction to the town, and so all 14 towns which had been previously unknown to the drones of Simpsons fans battled it out via city-created videos that were posted on the USAToday and Simpsons webpage.
The next incantation of TiVO will be a $300 HDTV set top box capable of plugging in to both your television and your computer. TiVO 3 is rumoured to offer single and multi streams, and possibly could serve as a digital unscrambler for IPTV channels in the future. The interesting thing is that real IPTV channels may not be so far ahead, with TiVO 3 having some 
The Live Earth Concert - "the ultimate campaign to save the Earth" went off without a hitch yesterday (Saturday), as it was broadcasted simulataneously across the world with viewers from all parts of the globe checking in to see their favourite stars perform in any 1 of several concert venues located across all 7 continents and amongst some of the biggest countries in the world. The campaign fueled by Al Gore, was cited as a "tremendous success in promoting a greener future for our planet."
The 7 Wonders of the World have been announced (
Video is undoubtedly killing television, and with TV's demise comes the death of serveral television stars - who are all vulnerable to their latest escapades being covered by the various tabloid websites popular on the Internet. While images have been the bain of Celebrities for centuries, video has quickly made it all the more embarassing for celebrity to be quoted saying something ignorant or stupid. While an image could capture an embarassing moment, video allows everyone to relive it over and over and over again. Even worse is that video prevents celebrities from rebutting claims or falsifying the evidence, because everyone can see the video for themselves and make a judgement on what actually happened. Granted that video, much like any other medium, can be edited to appeal to a particular agenda - it's a lot more difficult, and even in its edited form still gives off a better impresion of what actually happened (something which can never truly be hidden).
The announcing of the 
When you live in a country as ethnically diverse as America, Canada, UK or any other country for that matter, you're bound to have people whose culture or language differs from that of the dominant culture. Large Telecoms and Media companies have exploited this for far too long and they usually offer a basic tier of cable, and special language or cultural channels are deemed "speciality channels" and you have to pay a premium subscription to just get the few channels that you want.
Not so new, but more of a new discovery to me - is the existance of a site called FreeTube, that claims it "[..] lets you watch TV online for free without the need for any special software, hardware or subscription service. We are a completely free alternative to cable television that lets you watch tv channels and tv shows online using just your browser. "